Skip to content

Lesson Learned: If you get notice of a UDRP proceeding – defend it.

In another UDRP decision last week, the rights to the domain name were transferred from the owner to the Complainant, IPS Corporation, largely because the original owner failed to respond whatsoever to the complaint. IPS Corporation owns several trademarks worldwide for the term WELD-ON, which is a bonding material for use with all types of plastic pipes. However, the website as it stood before the decision of the Panel, simply contained third-party links and a search engine.

As previously stated in the Lady Gaga domain dispute post from last week, in order for a domain name to be transferred from the owner to the Complainant, three things must be proven to be true (via ICANN):

(1) the domain name registered by Respondent is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which Complainant has rights;

(2) Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the domain name; and

(3) the domain name has been registered and is being used in bad faith.

In the first case, the Complainant argued that the domain name is confusing similar to his WELD-ON trademark, as it contains the same name, simply without the hyphen. The Panel easily agreed with this claim.

However, the second point was even more of a cake-walk for the Complainant than the first. Because the original domain owner did not respond to the complaint, it was easy for the Panel to assume that there was no legitimate interest in the domain name. In the absence of a response, however, the record must be looked at to determine rights or legitimate interests. Because of the nature of the website (third-party links with a search engine), some of the links were sending the viewers to competitor websites of the IPS Corporation. The Panel swiftly concluded that this was not a legitimate noncommercial use and found agreement with point number 2.

On to the third point: IPS Corporation was able to show that the original owner of the domain has had other “bad faith” registrations in which they used other trademarks to host the same sort of website. Because of the past history and the fact that the domain hosted competitor links, the domain owner was found to be gaining commercial benefits from the trademark held by IPS Corporation, and therefore, the domain name was found to be used in bad faith.

After establishing all three points, the Panel transferred the rights to the domain from the original owner to IPS Corporation. Perhaps one of the most important lessons in this case is that because the original domain owner did not respond to the complaint, it was easy to prove the three points as there was no rebuttal, giving IPS Corporation the rights to the domain name.

The entire decision can be read here.

This post was drafted by Heather Mims and edited by Eric Crusius.

6 Comments Post a comment
  1. DESKTOP games or on-line games have enhanced in popularity
    nowadays, not only using the younger era, but also
    with grown ups too. There are numerous online games available, beginning from the intelligent
    for the standard – the options are absolutely endless.

    On-line role-playing games usually are very well-known games throughout the total world.
    In such a popularity, plenty of folks are researching as
    well as striving to learn methods to go through the complete game as rapidly as they could;

    November 28, 2013
  2. True, though DPI won the WIPO case, uonnkwn to the public, ITT still hounds them racking up Legal bills for their small company. They are proving to be sore losers of the WIPO decision and their part in making the landmark precedent. ITT was proven wrong, and they don’t like it. And the threatening letters keep coming. It may be personal on the part of ITT’s attorney, as he was the attorney employed by ITT as their intellectual property representative, when the sites were registered, and He did not catch it on his watch. Now retained outside the firm, he is trying to restrict DPI’s legal use of the Domains. DPI is considering creating a website to disclose all correspondence related to the entire action between the companies in order to inform the public of the intensity of the pursuit being experienced by DPI. It will also give other victims of this type of action an unprecedented look inside the entire experience. The WIPO summary is just that, a summary. The entire complaint filed by ITT was the size of a phonebook and was thought to take a year to prepare by ITT’s legal counsel. And that did not include the unsolicited response to DPI’s response. The secondary response was not allowed in the case, nor was DPI’s response to it. Though DPI paid to have their attorneys prepare a defense to it. DPI had 20 days to respond to the WIPO complaint, which it did in that 20 day period, DPI not only had to respond in 20 days, but they had to also educate themselves on what a WIPO case was all about. That meant many sleepless nights reviewing hundreds of previous cases and reading the UDRP. Then, refute every ridiculous claim ITT made in their complaint. This case will probably end with another landmark decision, but that decision will probably be handed down by the Federal court system this time. If ITT won’t accept WIPO’s decision as a resolution, maybe they will accept the Courts decision.

    November 28, 2013
  3. PERSONAL COMPUTER games or on-line games have enhanced in popularity currently, besides with all the younger
    era, but with grown ups as well. There are numerous game titles available, beginning from the intellectual for
    the ordinary – your choices are truly endless. On-line role-playing games are very
    recognized games everywhere over the whole world. Utilizing this type of acceptance, an
    abundance of people are researching along with striving to find
    approaches to have the whole game as quickly as they can certainly;

    February 23, 2014
  4. Due to the fact new porn websites are created every minute of every moment, some sort of blacklist cannot quite possibly provide
    complete protection. Because of this there may regularly be
    sites not blocked by the web address blacklist. New software advancements give an additional way to mass content: lively content scanning.
    Active content material scanning analyzes this
    article of a webpage with regard to inappropriate content just
    before and can possibly be shown. This method
    of parent control will likely be effective the
    second a adult site is made. You don’t need to to wait patiently for any site being added onto any blacklist.

    Still active written content scanning is not really a gold bullet.

    May 27, 2014

Trackbacks & Pingbacks

  1. Do not fight larger battles in UDRP proceedings | InternetBiz Law
  2. Recent UDRP Proceedings: Don’t Buy Misspelled Domains | InternetBiz Law

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: